Shipman v. Marlo Enterprises, Inc. et al
Cheree Shipman |
Marlo Enterprises, Inc. and Martin Reed |
4:2014cv00052 |
March 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Savannah Office |
Chatham |
G. R. Smith |
William T. Moore |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered Granting Plaintiff's Third Motion for Default Judgment. (loh) |
Filing 29 ORDERED that Plaintiff is DIRECTED to demonstrate, within ten days from the date of this order, why no further action has been taken in this case. Failure to do so will result in dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 8/30/17. (loh) |
Filing 26 ORDER denying 25 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 3/7/17. (wwp) |
Filing 19 ORDER dismissing as moot 18 Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk's entries of default as to Defendants Marlo re 11 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT and Reed re 17 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT are VACTATED. Plaintiff is Ordered to re-serve re 15 Amended Complaint at the correct address. Plaintiff may seek a Clerk's entry of default and default judgment. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 4/18/2016. (loh) |
Filing 13 ORDER dismissing as moot 9 Motion to Dismiss. The Court grants 12 Plaintiff's request to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date of this order to file her amended complaint. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 2/9/15. (wwp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.