The United States for the use and benefit of Preferred Materials, Inc. v. Q.B.S., Inc. et al
| The United States for the use and benefit of Preferred Materials, Inc. |
| Q.B.S., Inc., Federal Insurance Company and Arco, Inc. |
| Arco, Inc. |
| Federal Insurance Company and Q.B.S., Inc. |
| 4:2014cv00207 |
| September 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| G. R. Smith |
| Miller Act |
| 40 U.S.C. ยง 270 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDERED that this case Administratively Closed without prejudice to the right of any party with standing to reopen it. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 4/3/2015. (loh)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDERED that this 1 Complaint is stayed in its entirety, pending arbitration of all claims herein pursuant to the terms of the Arbitration Agreement. It is further ordered that the parties shall participate in arbitration of all claims herein, in accordance with the terms of the Arbitration Agreement, with any arbitration hearing to be completed on or before 8/15/15. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 12/4/14. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
5
GENERAL ORDER: Report of Rule (26)f planning meeting. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 9/19/2014. (loh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
