Owens v. Morales et al
| Jackie D. Owens |
| Jose Morales, Deputy Warden of Care and Treatment, Milton, Henderson and C.S.P. Mailroom Supervisor |
| 4:2014cv00273 |
| December 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case without prejudice. (loh)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER directing all parties to be served re 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Jackie D. Owens. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 8/25/2015. (loh)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER directing the plaintiff to submit a statement within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 8/13/15. (bcw)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 4 Motion for TRO; denying 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 8 Motion, enying 12 Motion. Owens is directed, within 21 days of the date this Order is served, to admit or deny that he is the Owens who filed the CV497-248 case. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 5/26/15. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER of Instruction to plaintiff. Owens must place his "Response to Court Order" in his prison mail system, and affirm that he has done so, within fourteen days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 3/2/2015. (loh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
