ProAssurance Casualty Company v. Smith et al
ProAssurance Casualty Company |
Wilson R. Smith, Robert L. Jenkins and Smith and Jenkins, P.C. |
4:2015cv00051 |
February 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Savannah Office |
Chatham |
G. R. Smith |
William T. Moore |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 JUDGMENT entered granting Plaintiff ProAssurance Casualty Company's Motion for Summary Judgment. (loh) |
Filing 73 ORDER granting 50 MOTION for Hearing re 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment. The Court will hold a hearing on Plaintiff's motion at 2:00 pm. on Friday, 4/29/16. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 4/18/16. (wwp) |
Filing 71 ORDER withdrawing 67 Motion to Re-open Discovery and Supplement Response to MSJ; granting 68 Motion to Withdraw re 67 Motion to Re-open Discovery and Supplement Response to MSJ. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 4/7/2016. (loh) |
Filing 63 ORDER STAYING CASE and administratively closing the case. Should it become necessary, Plaintiff may move to lift the stay and reopen this case. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 1/22/15. (wwp) |
Filing 27 ORDER dismissing as moot 20 Motion for Protective Order; dismissing as moot 21 Motion for Protective Order; dismissing as moot 22 Motion to Compel; granting 25 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 8/10/2015. (loh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.