Carter v. Wilcher et al
| Russell Carter |
| John Wilcher, Corizon Health, Inc, Joseph Moyse, Lindsey Jackson, Mary Browne, K. Harris, Shevon Campbell, V. Allen, M. White, Angela Jackson and R. Lewis |
| 4:2016cv00084 |
| April 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 6/30/17. (jrb)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER Dismissing with Prejudice Defendants re 86 Stipulation of Dismissal 73 Stipulation of Dismissal 83 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Russell Carter. The Clerk is directed to amend the caption accordingly. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 4/20/17. (jrb)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER granting the 80 MOTION to Withdraw 75 MOTION to Amend/Correct the Complaint to Add Party Defendants Chatham County, Georgia and Al Scott as Chair of the Board of Commissioners of Chatham County, Georgia filed by Russell Carter. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 3/8/17. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER dismissing as moot 33 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 12/15/16. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 52 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 11/2/16. (wwp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
