CSX Transportation, Inc v. Kirkland et al
| CSX Transportation, Inc |
| James Michael Kirkland, Transportation Inc Agent Group, Inc, Hudson Insurance Company and New Hamphire Insurance Company |
| 4:2016cv00117 |
| May 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER granting 57 Motion to Withdraw the Admissions, Denying 58 MOTION to Strike 41 Expert Witness Report, 38 Expert Witness Report and Exclude Expert Testimony. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 5/24/17. (jrb)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER re 59 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by CSX Transportation, Inc. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant CDS Transport, Inc. are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 3/22/17. (jlm)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER re 42 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by CSX Transportation, Inc. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Hudson Insurance Company are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 12/20/16. (jlm)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 21 Motion for Leave to Appear for attorney Jeffrey Cohen. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 7/26/16. (wwp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
