Schwindler v. Holt
| Frank Joseph Schwindler |
| Ahmed Holt |
| 4:2016cv00189 |
| July 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER dismissing as moot re 104 Motion for Certificate of Appealability; dismissing as moot re 104 Motion for Reconsideration; granting re 109 Second Renewed Motion to Appoint Counsel. To permit Mr. Mikell an opportunity to review this matte r and consult with his client, this case is STAYED until December 1, 2023. During the pendency of the stay, the parties are DIRECTED to confer and, no later than December 1, 2023, file a joint Status Report proposing a schedule, or if they cannot agree their respective proposals, for further proceedings on Respondent's re 78 Amended Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 9/5/23. (loh)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDERED that Petitioner is DIRECTED to file any reply to Respondent's re 78 Amended Answer no later than November 2, 2022. This case shall remain STAYED until November 2, 2022 to permit Schwindler time to prepare and file his reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 8/4/22. (loh)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER directing the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case during the pendency of the stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 3/18/2021. (ca)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER staying all deadlines in this case until the Plaintiff's Appeal is concluded. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 4/30/19. (jrb)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER denying 51 Motion Rule 60. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 4/1/19. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER adopting 49 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 39 Supplement to Motion to Dismiss; and denying 20 Motion to Dismiss. The Court will STAY this case and HOLD IN ABEYANCE any ruling on Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition until such time as he exhausts his state remedies. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 5/4/18. (trb)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER denying as moot 15 Motion to transfer case. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 2/7/17. (jlm)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 8 Motion to transfer case. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transfer this case to the Northern District of Georgia signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 1/25/17. (jlm)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER denying 11 Motion for order transferring case to Northern District. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 1/3/17. (jlm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schwindler v. Holt | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Frank Joseph Schwindler | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ahmed Holt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
