Jackson v. Morales
Petitioner: Tion Jackson
Respondent: Jose Morales
Case Number: 4:2016cv00321
Filed: November 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Savannah Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall
Presiding Judge: G. R. Smith
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241st
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER adopting the 5 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court; and dismissing without prejudice Tion Jackson's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 1-6/2017. (jah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Morales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tion Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jose Morales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?