Huggins v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: David Lee Huggins
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2017cv00054
Filed: March 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Savannah Office
County: Chatham
Presiding Judge: G. R. Smith
Presiding Judge: William T. Moore
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 JUDGMENT Dismissing Case without prejudice. Signed by Deputy clerk on 11/9/18. (jrb)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER Directing the Plaintiff to file his opening brief within 14 days from the date this order is served or face a recommendation of dismissal for failure to comply with a Court order. ( Brief due by 10/3/2018.) Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 9/19/18. (jrb)
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER that within 14 days of the date this Order is served, plaintiff shall either: (1) file his opening brief, or (2) otherwise show cause why this case should not be dismissed on inactivity and, thus, abandonment grounds. (Brief due by 9/12/2018.) Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 8/29/18. (Attachments: # 1 General Order for Social Security Appeals) (jrb)
July 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Directing the Clerk to forward a copy of Huggins' Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service upon defendant and to serve both parties with the General Order in Social Security Appeals. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 7/31/17. (jrb)
July 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER to file a Second Amended Complaint that fully answers the three basic requirements set forth above within 14 days from the date this Order is served, or the Court will recommend that the Complaint be dismissed. (Compliance due by 7/28/2017.) Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 7/14/17. (jlm)
June 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re 6 Amended Complaint filed by David Lee Huggins. If plaintiff fails to file a Second Amended Complaint within 21 days from the date this Order is served, or fails to cure the deficiencies identified, the Court will recommend that the Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (Compliance due by 7/20/2017.) Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 6/28/17. (jlm)
June 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER instructing the plaintiff to file an amended Complaint within 21 days from the date this order is served. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 6/14/17. (jrb) Modified on 6/14/2017 (jrb).
April 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 General ORDER for Social Security Appeals. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 4/18/17. (wwp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Huggins v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Lee Huggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?