Oliver v. County of Chatham et al
| Anthony Oliver |
| County of Chatham, Franklin Rollins, Jr., John T. Wilcher, County of Effingham, Jimmie McDuffie and Does 1-10 |
| 4:2017cv00101 |
| June 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
221
JUDGMENT entered dismissing Plaintiff's Amended Complaint With Prejudice. (loh)
|
|
Filing
201
ORDER granting 200 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 169 Amended Complaint filed by Chris Nease. Defendant Nease shall file his pleading within 14 days after the entry of an order on the March 30, 2018 189 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 4/5/18. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
190
ORDER denying as moot 180 Motion for Extension of Time; denying as moot 183 Motion for Marshal Service; denying as moot 185 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 186 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 187 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 3/30/18. (jrb)
|
|
Filing
188
ORDER ADOPTING 166 Report and Recommendations and granting 121 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, denying 63 Motion to Disqualify Counsel, denying in part 96 Motion for Sanctions, denying 62 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, denying 29 Motion to Dismiss, denying 20 Motion to Dismiss, denying 64 Motion for Sanctions, granting 123 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, granting 122 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, denying 117 Motion to Dismiss, denying 30 Motion to Sea l Document, denying 16 Motion for TRO, denying 67 Motion to Strike, denying 71 Motion to Dismiss, denying 40 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, denying 102 Motion to Strike, granting in part 79 Motion for Protective Order, denying [21 ] Motion to Stay, denying 41 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, denying 28 Motion to Dismiss, denying 31 Motion to Disqualify Counsel, denying 144 Motion to Dismiss, denying 75 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 3/27/18. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
168
ORDER denying 36 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 46 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 53 Motion ; denying as moot 59 Motion ; denying 60 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 61 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 77 M otion to Strike ; granting 80 Motion to Substitute Attorney, granting 81 Motion to Amend/Correct; denied as moot 87 Motion to Withdraw ; terminating 88 Motion for Writ of Mandamus; denying 95 Motion to Withdraw ; denying 96 Motion f or Sanctions; denying as moot 106 Motion ; denying 107 Motion ; denying 108 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 111 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 112 Motion for Discovery; denying 115 Motion for Hearing; denying 124 Motio n ; denying 127 Motion to Strike ; denying as moot 128 Motion to Withdraw ; denying as moot 151 Motion for Leave to File; denying 156 Motion ; granting 15 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 160 Motion to Change Venue; denying 161 Motion ; denying 162 Motion to Compel; denying 163 Motion to Strike ; denying 23 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 3/8/18. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER denying 7 Motion for leave to file through the Courts CM/ECF program. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 6/13/17. (wwp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
