Cowart v. Nautilus Insurance Company et al
Delma Cowart |
Nautilus Insurance Company and Audrey Manes |
4:2017cv00142 |
July 28, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Savannah Office |
Chatham |
G. R. Smith |
Lisa G. Wood |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDERED that more than fourteen days have passed with neither Plaintiff nor Defendant Manes having filed anything in the case since the entry of the re 39 Show Cause Order. As a result, the Court hereby DISMISSES this case with prejudice. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 3/7/19. (loh) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting re 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Nautilus is DISMISSED from this action. The Clerk, however, shall withhold the entry of judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Nautilus and against Plaintiff until the conclusion of the case as the case otherwise remains pending against Audrey Manes. The Court HEREBY ORDERS Plaintiff Delma Cowart to show cause, in writing, within 14 days from the date of this Order why the Court should not dismiss all claims against Manes in this action. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 1/17/19. (loh) |
Filing 25 ORDER granting 20 Motion to file original discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 2/6/18. (jrb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.