Simplis et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
Frain Simplis and Lashondra Simplis |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, Transland Financial Services, Does 1-20, Washington Mutual Bank and All Persons claiming any interest in real property located at 864 Stonebridge Blvd, Savannah, GA 31405 |
4:2017cv00183 |
October 5, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Savannah Office |
Chatham |
J. Randal Hall |
G. R. Smith |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 1/24/19. (loh) |
Filing 34 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiffs failure to prosecute, failure to follow this Courts Orders, and failure to timely serve the Complaint. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 1/15/19. (jrb) |
Filing 33 ORDERED that Plaintiff's are to show cause, in writing within 14 days from the date of this Order, why they have not timely served the remaining Defendants within 90 days as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/25/18. (loh) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Stay Pretrial and Discovery Deadlines; granting 15 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to 11 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 11/15/17. (loh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.