Henderson v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Gladys Henderson
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 4:2017cv00225
Filed: November 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Savannah Office
County: Effingham
Presiding Judge: G. R. Smith
Presiding Judge: William T. Moore
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER adopting 15 Report and Recommendations. The Court affirms the final decision of the Acting Commissioner. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 3/12/19. (trb)
November 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 2 General Order for Social Security Appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 11/13/17. (wwp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henderson v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gladys Henderson
Represented By: Stephen H. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?