Higgins v. The City of Savannah, Georgia et al
| Janet K. Higgins |
| The City of Savannah, Georgia, Eddie Deloach, Van R. Johnson, Bill Durrence, John Hall, Estella Edwards Shabazz, Brooks Stillwell, Carolyn Bell, Brian Foster, Tony Thomas, Julian Miller, John Sawyer, Rob Hernandez and Richard Spivey |
| 4:2017cv00257 |
| December 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER adopting 28 Report and Recommendations; denying 21 Motion for Sanctions; finding as moot 24 Motion to Strike; 26 Motion in Opposition; 27 Motion to Supplement; 8 Motion for Special Consideration; 11 Motion for Hearing; [18 ] Motion to Qualify and Restrict Time for Defendants to Respond; 22 Motion in Favor of Summary Judgment; and 23 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff's 5 Motion to Remand is granted and Plaintiff's complaint is Remanded to the Superior Court of Chatham County. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 5/29/18. (trb)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 12 Motion to Amend/Correct Motion to Remand; granting 15 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 16 Motion to Exclude Defendant's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 2/8/18. (jrb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
