United States of America v. 33 Firearms and 21,912 Rounds of Ammunition
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 33 Firearms and 21,912 Rounds of Ammunition
Claimant: Therese Ryan
Case Number: 4:2018cv00011
Filed: January 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Savannah Office
County: Chatham
Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall
Presiding Judge: G. R. Smith
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 0981
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 40 JUDGMENT entered pursuant to 39 Order. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 4/23/2021. (ca)
April 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting United States' 38 Motion for Default Judgment and Motion for Forfeiture of Property. The Clerk is hereby directed to enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure upon the same terms and condition as outlined in this Default Judgment and Final Order of Forfeiture. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 4/22/2021. (ca)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER Granting the Government's request that the Court not dismiss the claim, but rather allow thirty days to re-engage claimant's counsel on settlement or permit the Government to seek a Default Judgment or Final Order of Forfeiture re [31 ] Status Report filed by United States of America. The Parties have thirty days from the date of this order to complete settlement, request an extension or seek a Default Judgment and Final Order of Forfeiture. (Compliance due by 11/20/2020.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on October 23, 2020. (jrb)
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER directing the parties to submit a status report within 10 days from the date of this order detailing whether the sale has been completed and whether this case should be dismissed. (Status Report due by 10/18/2020). Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/8/20. (wwp)
May 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDERED that counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for claimant Therese Ryan to provide a joint update on the status of this case within 14 days of the date of this Order. (Compliance due by 5/24/2019). Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 5/10/19. (wwp)
May 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 5/10/18. (wwp) Modified on 5/10/2018 (wwp).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. 33 Firearms and 21,912 Rounds of Ammunition
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Theodore S. Hertzberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 33 Firearms and 21,912 Rounds of Ammunition
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Therese Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?