Johnson v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities
Reginald V. Johnson, II |
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities |
4:2018cv00050 |
March 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Savannah Office |
Chatham |
G. R. Smith |
Lisa G. Wood |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 80 ORDERED that the order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is made the order of this Court. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 1/31/2020. (loh) |
Filing 71 JUDGMENT dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The case is closed. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/2/19. (wwp) |
Filing 70 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 67 of the U.S. Magistrate Judge as the Opinion of this Court. Since Johnson lacks standing to challenge the defendants action, his Complaint must be DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. His Motion for Summary Judgment, therefore, is DENIED as moot 51 . Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/27/19. (jrb) |
Filing 68 ORDER denying as moot 49 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 54 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; dismissing as moot 63 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 9/10/19. (wwp) |
Filing 60 ORDER ADOPTING 57 Report and Recommendations overruling Plaintiff's 58 objections and denying 27 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, denying 37 Motion to Expedite denying 2 Motion for Writ of Mandamus filed by Reginald V. Johnson, II. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 1/15/19. (wwp) Modified on 1/15/2019 (wwp). |
Filing 56 ORDER denying 40 Motion for Hearing; dismissing 48 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 12/19/18. (jrb) Modified on 12/20/2018 (jrb). |
Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING 12 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court, Plaintiff's claims for punitive damages are dismissed, and Commissioner Judy Fitzgerald, in her official capacity, is substituted as Defendnat. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 7/23/2018. (ca) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff a blank IFP motion. Plaintiff must supplement the 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Reginald V. Johnson, II within 14 days of this Order. (Compliance due by 3/29/2018). Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 3/15/18. (wwp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Reginald V. Johnson, II | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.