Brown v. Savannah Metro Police et al
| James Willis Brown, Jr. |
| Louisa Abbot, Scott C. Robichaux, Savannah Metro Police, Thomas M. Cerbone, Susan Fandrich, Meg Heap, Lindretta Kramer, Thomas R. Bateski and June Elizabeth Fogle |
| 4:2018cv00170 |
| July 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| William T Moore |
| G R Smith |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee payment received, Amount $10.06, Receipt SAV033016. (evb) |
| Filing fee payment received, Amount $12.58, Receipt SAV033017. (evb) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for access to law library by James Willis Brown, Jr. REFERRED to Judge G. R. Smith.(wwp) |
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by James Willis Brown, Jr. (wwp) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT by Prisoner James Willis Brown, Jr to collection of fees. (wwp) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. PLRA due by 8/17/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 7/18/18. (wwp)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Willis Brown, Jr. REFERRED to Judge G. R. Smith.(wwp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by James Willis Brown, Jr. (Attachments: #1 env)(wwp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
