Ruf v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Lawrence E. Ruf |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and HSBC, USA., N.A. |
| 4:2018cv00194 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| R Stan Baker |
| James E Graham |
| J Randal Hall |
| G R Smith |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Graham per order in case 4:18mc-16. Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith no longer assigned to the case. (jrb) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint [Dkt. No. 13-1] by HSBC, USA., N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 10/23/2018. (Ebbs, Arthur) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION for Leave to File filed by HSBC, USA., N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Ebbs, Arthur) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Lawrence E. Ruf. Responses due by 10/9/2018. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint)REFERRED to Judge G. R. Smith.(jrb) |
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge R. Stan Baker for all further proceedings. Chief Judge J. Randal Hall no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 09/04/2018. (evs)
|
|
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to Appear PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 09/04/18. (sff)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number 113J-2440458, Fee Amount $200, by HSBC, USA., N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 9/18/2018. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ebbs, Arthur) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by HSBC, USA., N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Arthur A. Ebbs (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ebbs, Arthur) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Lawrence E. Ruf. Responses due by 9/14/2018. REFERRED to Judge G. R. Smith.(jrb) |
| Filing 7 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Lawrence E. Ruf. (jrb) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HSBC, USA., N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. identifying Wells Fargo & Company as Corporate Parent. (Ambler, Robert) Modified on 8/21/2018 (jrb). |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by HSBC, USA., N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 9/4/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Assignment, #2 Exhibit Security Deed)(Ambler, Robert) |
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER: Report of Rule 26(f) planning meeting. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 8/17/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice) (loh)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD re #1 Notice of Removal. (loh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Plaintiff re #1 Notice of Removal, by HSBC, USA., N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (loh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by HSBC, USA. N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from Superior Court of Chatham County, case number SPCV18-00794-MO. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113J-2430974), filed by Lawrence E. Ruf. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Full Removal from State Court, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(loh) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Notice of Appearance/ Pro Hac Vice Motion due by 8/26/2018. Compliance due by 8/26/2018. (loh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
