Heyward-Jones v. Reid et al
| Kavon Heyward-Jones |
| Officer Reid, Sheriff John Wilcher and Chatham County Sheriff Office |
| 4:2019cv00092 |
| April 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| William T Moore |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Inmate Account Statement by Kavon Heyward-Jones. (loh) |
| Filing 6 Inmate Account Statement by Kavon Heyward-Jones. (loh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/10/2019: #1 Supplement) (loh). |
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Kavon Heyward-Jones. (loh) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT by Prisoner Kavon Heyward-Jones to collection of fees. (loh) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within fourteen days of the date this Order is served. PLRA due by 5/13/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 4/29/19. (loh)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kavon Heyward-Jones. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(loh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kavon Heyward-Jones.(loh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
