Williams v. Deal
| Ronnie Eugene Williams |
| James Deal |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE) and Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only) |
| 4:2019cv00121 |
| May 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| William T Moore |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing the petition and rendering moot any request for in forma pauperis status on appeal. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 7/12/19. (wwp) |
Filing 6
ORDER ADOPTING the #4 Report and Recommendations dismissing the case. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 7/11/19. (wwp)
|
| Filing 5 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Ronnie Eugene Williams. (wwp) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS dismissing the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and denying #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ronnie Eugene Williams. The in forma pauperis status on appeal should likewise be denied. Objections to R&R due by 6/14/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 5/31/19. (wwp) |
| Filing 3 Inmate Account Statement by Ronnie Eugene Williams. (wwp) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronnie Eugene Williams. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(wwp) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ronnie Eugene Williams.(wwp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
