Coppins v. Berryhill
| Christopher L. Coppins |
| Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2019cv00188 |
| August 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradford Collins Patrick on behalf of Andrew Saul (Patrick, Bradford) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul. (evk) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 08/09/2019. (evk)
|
| Filing 5 Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (wwp) |
|
Filing 4
General Order for Social Security Appeals. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 8/1/19. (wwp)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Submitted. (wwp) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher L. Coppins. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(wwp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Christopher L. Coppins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wwp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
