The United States of America, On Behalf of and for the use of Stan Weaver and Company v. First Infinity Construction, Inc. et al
| The United States of America, On Behalf of and for the use of Stan Weaver and Company |
| First Infinity Construction, Inc. and United States Fire Insurance Company |
| 4:2019cv00329 |
| December 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| William T Moore |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Miller Act |
| 40 U.S.C. ยง 270 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: United States Fire Insurance Company answer due 12/31/2019. (evk) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Plaintiff's Disclosure Statement, General Order, Notice of ADR/Case Management Procedures served on CT Corporation (Linda Banks), Registered Agent on 12/10/2019, filed by The United States of America, On Behalf of and for the use of Stan Weaver and Company. (Hughes, Robert) |
Filing 5
RULE 26(f)ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 12/5/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice) (wwp)
|
| Filing 4 Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (wwp) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to First Infinity Construction, Inc., United States Fire Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(wwp) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by The United States of America, On Behalf of and for the use of Stan Weaver and Company. (wwp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against First Infinity Construction, Inc., United States Fire Insurance Company, filed by The United States of America, On Behalf of and for the use of Stan Weaver and Company.(wwp) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number 113J-2735212. (wwp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The United States of America, On Behalf of and for the use of Stan Weaver and Company v. First Infinity Construction, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The United States of America, On Behalf of and for the use of Stan Weaver and Company | |
| Represented By: | Robert Clayton Hughes, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: First Infinity Construction, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Fire Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
