Hutto v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Edward Hutto |
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Walmart Supercenter #635 |
4:2020cv00241 |
October 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
William T Moore |
Christopher L Ray |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting re #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 3/10/21. (loh) |
Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and Remaining Deadlines by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. Responses due by 3/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Modified Scheduling Order)(Meader, Garret) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #11 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and Remaining Deadlines. (wwp) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Discovery due by 5/10/2021. Motions due by 6/9/2021. Status Report due by 5/24/2021. (loh) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 12/1/2020. Discovery due by 3/10/2021. Motions due by 4/9/2021. Expert Witness Report (Plaintiff) due by 12/21/2020. Expert Witness Report (defendant) due by 1/21/2021. Status Report due by 3/25/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 10/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Trial Information, #2 Joint Status Report) (loh) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 11/4/2020. (wwp) |
Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Meader, Garret) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD re #1 Notice of Removal. (loh) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP.(loh) |
Filing 5 Statement of Motions Pending. (loh) |
Filing 4 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (loh) |
Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (loh) |
Filing 2 GENERAL ORDER: Report of Rule 26(f) planning meeting. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 10/2/2020. (loh) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP from State Court of Chatham County, case number STCV2001496. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGASDC-2937722). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(loh) |
Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (loh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hutto v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Walmart Supercenter #635 | |
Represented By: | Garret W. Meader |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Edward Hutto | |
Represented By: | Albert Maitland Yates, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.