Reed v. Social Security Administration et al
| Louis Reed, Jr. |
| Social Security Administration and U.S. Attorney Office |
| 4:2020cv00265 |
| October 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
CONSENT by Prisoner Louis Reed, Jr to collection of fees. (loh)
|
|
Filing 7
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Louis Reed, Jr. (loh)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. PLRA due by 11/11/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 10/28/2020. (JH)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER re Magistrate Assignment as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney Office. Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment Due on 11/11/2020. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on October 28, 2020. (Attachments: #1 Statement Regarding Assignment) (jrb)
|
|
Filing 3
Inmate Account Statement by Louis Reed, Jr. (jrb)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Louis Reed, Jr. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(jrb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Louis Reed, Jr.(jrb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/27/2020: #1 Redacted Image) (jrb).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
