Robbins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Rhonda Robbins |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
4:2020cv00269 |
October 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
R Stan Baker |
Christopher L Ray |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ca) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting re #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 10/29/2020. (loh) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis . (JH) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rhonda Robbins. Responses due by 11/11/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Affidavit)(White Park, Sarah) |
Filing 3 ORDER re Magistrate Assignment as to Commissioner of Social Security. Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment Due on 11/11/2020. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/28/20. (Attachments: #1 Statement) (wwp) |
Filing 2 Summons Submitted (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons)(wwp) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Rhonda Robbins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 USM FORM, #3 USM FORM, #4 USM FORM)(wwp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.