Thomas v. Doe et al
Claudette Thomas |
Manager on, John Doe doing business as Texas Roadhouse and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. |
4:2020cv00277 |
November 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
R Stan Baker |
Christopher L Ray |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by James B. Stevens on behalf of Claudette Thomas (Stevens, James) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD re #1 Notice of Removal. (loh) |
Filing 2 RULE 26 INSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 11/10/2020. (loh) |
Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (loh) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Notice of Appearance/Pro Hac Vice Motion due by 11/20/2020. Compliance due by 11/20/2020. (loh) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Texas Roadhouse, Inc. from State Court Chatham County, Georgia, case number STCV19-02143. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGASDC-2962196). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, Texas Roadhouse Answer, Manager 12-22-17 Answer, Notice of Removal to State Court, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(loh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.