Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc v. Hovey et al
| Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc |
| G.W. ARU LLC and Katherine J.M. Hovey |
| 4:2020cv00322 |
| December 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| William T Moore |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
RULE 26(f)ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 12/28/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice) (wwp)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (wwp)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against G.W. ARU LLC, Katherine J.M. Hovey, filed by Johnson Matthey Process Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Offer Letter, #2 Exhibit B - Secrecy Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - iCloud Drive Summary, #4 Exhibit D - Acceptance of Resignation Letter, #5 Exhibit E - LinkedIn Announcement, #6 Exhibit F - Slide from Presentation, #7 Exhibit G - Letter to Kate Hovey, #8 Exhibit H - Email from Michael Dailey, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(wwp)
|
|
Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number AGASDC - 2995698. (wwp) Modified on 12/28/2020 (wwp).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
