Mulherin v. Saul
| Michael Mulherin |
| Andrew Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2021cv00036 |
| February 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| William T Moore |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, Attorney General, and Civil Process Clerk. (JH) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 2/10/2021. (JH)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Submitted. (JH) |
|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER FOR SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 2/8/2021. (JH)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Mulherin. Responses due by 2/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (JH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Michael Mulherin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (JH) |
| Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (JH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
