Edmond v. Awe et al
Quinton Edmond |
Dr. Awe, Coastal State Prison and State of Georgia Department of Corrections |
4:2021cv00076 |
March 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
William T Moore |
Christopher L Ray |
Prisoner - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Letter from Quinton Edmond re in forma pauperis status. (jlh) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting re #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Prisoner Trust Account Statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 4/13/21. (loh) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit Prisoner Trust Account Statement, by Quinton Edmond. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(loh) |
Filing 6 CONSENT by Prisoner Quinton Edmond to collection of fees. (jrb) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 4/27/2021. (loh) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. PLRA due by 4/6/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 3/23/21. (loh) |
Filing 4 Summons Submitted. (ca) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Quinton Edmond. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(ca) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Quinton Edmond. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(ca) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Quinton Edmond.(ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.