Miller v. J C Bamford Excavators LTD.
| Barry Miller |
| J C Bamford Excavators LTD. |
| 4:2021cv00089 |
| March 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 6/7/2021; Discovery due by 8/30/2021; Motions due by 3/31/2022; Expert Witness Report (Plaintiff) due by 11/15/2021; Expert Witness Report (Defendant) due by 12/15/2021; and Status Report due by 3/17/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 05/13/2021. (jlh)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (slt) |
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Havlik, Gwendolyn) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by J C Bamford Excavators LTD.. (Havlik, Gwendolyn) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Barry Miller. Responses due by 5/4/2021. (Mikell, Samuel) |
| Filing 7 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by J C Bamford Excavators LTD.. (Havlik, Gwendolyn) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by J C Bamford Excavators LTD..(Havlik, Gwendolyn) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Barry Miller. (Mikell, Samuel) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brent J. Savage on behalf of Barry Miller (Savage, Brent) |
| Filing 3 REMOVAL NOTICE To All Counsel Of Record. Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 4/11/2021. Pending Motions due by 4/15/2021. (ca) |
|
Filing 2
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 4/1/2021. (ca)
|
| Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (ca) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from State Court of Chatham County, Georgia, case number STCV20-00464. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGASDC-3073785), filed by J C Bamford Excavators LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Filings to include Answer of Defendant, #2 Exhibit B - Defendant's Notice of Filing, #3 Exhibit C - Affidavit of Gwendolyn D. Havlik, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miller v. J C Bamford Excavators LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: J C Bamford Excavators LTD. | |
| Represented By: | Gwendolyn D. Havlik |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Barry Miller | |
| Represented By: | Samuel LeCraw Mikell |
| Represented By: | Brent Savage |
| Represented By: | Zachary R. Sprouse |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
