Davila v. Saul
| Javier Davila |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2021cv00177 |
| June 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Javier Davila. Andrew M. Saul served on 7/12/2021, answer due 9/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 certified mail receipt)(Jones, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Shannon Heath Statkus on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Statkus, Shannon)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Attorney Daniel S. Jones Leave to Appear pro hac vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 06/14/2021. (jlh)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Daniel S. Jones, Receipt Number: SAV039491, Fee Amount $200.00, by Javier Davila. (Attachment: #1 Receipt). REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (csr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/14/2021: #2 Statement re: appearance in SDGA) (slt).
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul. (csr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Javier Davila. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (csr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/14/2021: #2 Receipt) (csr).
|
|
Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number SAV039490. (csr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
