Ivester v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
Matthew Ivester |
Georgia Department of Corrections, Brooks Benton, FNU Jones, FNU B LT. Name Unknown and Timothy C. Ward |
4:2021cv00238 |
August 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
R Stan Baker |
Christopher L Ray |
Prisoner - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CONSENT by Prisoner Matthew Ivester to collection of fees. (maa) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Matthew Ivester. (maa) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within fourteen days of the date this Order is served PLRA due by 9/7/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 8/24/21. (loh) |
Filing 3 ORDER re Magistrate Assignment as to Georgia Department of Corrections, Brooks Benton, Jones, Name Unknown, Timothy C. Ward. Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment Due on 9/6/2021. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 08/23/2021. (Attachment: #1 Statement Regarding Assignment of Case Form.) (jlh) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Matthew Ivester. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (jlh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants, filed by Matthew Ivester.(jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.