Reed v. Social Security Administration of the United States of America et al
Louis Reed, Jr. |
Social Security Administration of the United States of America and U.S. Attorney Florida - Northern |
Social Security Administration |
4:2021cv00271 |
September 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Christopher L Ray |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 427 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration of the United States of America, U.S. Attorney Florida - Northern. (maa) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #5 Emergency Motion for an Order to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 11/18/2021. (maa) Modified on 11/18/2021 (maa). |
Filing 5 Emergency MOTION for an Order on or before November 15th, 2021, to Compel the Social Security Administration to Issue a Check filed by Louis Reed, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit). (csr) |
Filing 4 General ORDER for Social Security Appeals. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 9/27/2021. (pts) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Louis Reed, Jr. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(pts) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Louis Reed, Jr.(pts) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.