Cruz v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation et al
Alejandra Cruz |
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Agree Limited Partnership, Tru 2005 Re I, LLC and XYZ Corp. 1-2 |
4:2021cv00304 |
October 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
R Stan Baker |
Christopher L Ray |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER re #14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. The parties are DIRECTED to file a revised Rule 26(f) Report no later than December 15, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 12/8/21. (loh) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 12/22/2021. (JH) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (JH) |
Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Walker, Tyler) |
Filing 13 NOTICE by Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation Withdrawal Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel (Walker, Tyler) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Tyler Bryant Walker on behalf of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (Walker, Tyler) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #10 MOTION to Substitute Attorney. After 14 days a notice of noncompliance will be submitted to a judicial officerfor possible sanctions. Compliance due by 12/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 83.7)(thb) |
Filing 10 ***ENTERED IN ERROR*** MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation. Responses due by 12/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Walker, Tyler) Modified on 11/22/2021 (thb). |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Tru 2005 Re I, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal,,, Consent to Removal (Walker, Tyler) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Tru 2005 Re I, LLC.(Walker, Tyler) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Edgar Murray Smith on behalf of Alejandra Cruz (Smith, Edgar) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Consent to Removal by Agree Limited Partnership re #1 Notice of Removal. (Angersola, Joseph) Modified on 10/21/2021 (JH). |
Filing 5 Agree Limited Partnership's ANSWER to Complaint by Agree Limited Partnership.(Angersola, Joseph) |
Filing 4 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/15/2021. (csr) |
Filing 3 REMOVAL NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD re: #1 Notice of Removal. (csr) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Notice of Appearance or Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice due by 10/24/2021. Re-file any Pending Motions previously filed in State Court due by 10/28/2021. (csr) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation. (csr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation from the State Court of Chatham County, State of Georgia, case number STCV21-01660. (Filing fee paid on 10/14/2021 - $402.00; receipt number AGASDC-3206980). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Sheriff's Entry of Service, Summons, General Civil and Domestic Relations Case Filing Information Form, Complaint, Plaintiff's First Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Certificate under Rule 3.2 and Plaintiff's First Interrogatories to Defendant Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Removal to United States District Court, Notice of Removal, Amended Notice of Removal and Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C - Answer, #4 Federal Answer, #5 Civil Cover Sheet). (csr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.