Montanya v. Richmond et al
| Nicholas Montanya |
| Scott Richmond and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. |
| 4:2022cv00006 |
| January 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| William T Moore |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet served on Scott Richmond on 02/23/2022, filed by Nicholas Montanya. (Conley, Cale) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Scott Richmond answer due 3/16/2022. (JH) |
| Filing 4 Notice to All Counsel of Record: Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (jlh) |
Filing 3
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 01/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigants Bill of Rights Form.) (jlh)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Scott Richmond and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. (Attachment: #1 Samsung Summons.) (jlh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants, filed by Nicholas Montanya. (Fee paid: Receipt # AGASDC-3266005, $402.00.) (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet.) (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
