Smith v. Weisner et al
Plaintiff: Dreamieyla Smith
Defendant: Steven Weisner and Combined Transport, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2022cv00038
Filed: February 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: William T Moore
Referring Judge: Christopher L Ray
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro hac vice for attorney William Major III. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 3/23/22. (wwp)
March 23, 2022 MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (slt)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 4/12/2022; Discovery due by 8/12/2022; Motions due by 9/12/2022; Expert Witness Report (Plaintiff) due by 5/31/2022; Expert Witness Report (Defendant) due by 6/30/2022; and Status Report due by 8/26/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 03/22/2022. (jlh)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro hac vice for attorney David Wilson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 3/22/22. (wwp)
March 21, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE of Filing by Combined Transport, Inc., Steven Weisner re #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Keith, C.) Modified on 3/21/2022 (slt).
March 21, 2022 Filing 12 FILED IN ERROR. INCORRECT DOCUMENT ATTACHED - NOTICE of Filing by Combined Transport, Inc., Steven Weisner re #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Certificate of Good Standing (Keith, C.) Modified on 3/21/2022 (slt).
March 21, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing by Combined Transport, Inc., Steven Weisner re #7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Certificate of Good Standing (Keith, C.) Modified on 3/21/2022 (slt).
March 21, 2022 MOTIONS REFERRED: #7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (slt)
March 17, 2022 Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Keith, C.)
March 17, 2022 MOTIONS REFERRED: #10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (slt)
March 14, 2022 Filing 9 DEFICINECY NOTICE re #7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Compliance due by 3/28/2022. (slt)
March 14, 2022 Filing 8 DEFICIENCY NOTICE re #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Compliance due by 3/28/2022. (slt)
March 14, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number AGASDC-3304465, Fee Amount $200, by Combined Transport, Inc., Steven Weisner. Responses due by 3/28/2022. (Keith, C.) (Correct Certificate of Good Standing, doc #11 ) Modified on 3/21/2022 (slt).
March 14, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number AGASDC-3304382, Fee Amount $200, by Combined Transport, Inc., Steven Weisner. Responses due by 3/28/2022. (Keith, C.)
February 14, 2022 Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Combined Transport, Inc., Steven Weisner. (Keith, C.)
February 14, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE by Combined Transport, Inc., Steven Weisner of Statement Regarding Motions Pending In State Court At Time of Removal (Keith, C.)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 02/11/2022. (jlh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/11/2022: #1 Litigants Bill of Rights) (jlh).
February 11, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE to All Counsel of Record by Dreamieyla Smith. (Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 2/21/2022.) (jlh)
February 11, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from State Court of Chatham County, Georgia, case number STCV21-02399, filed by Steven Weisner and Combined Transport, Inc. (Filing fee 402.00, receipt number AGASDC-3283958.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Civil Cover Sheet, Affidavit of Service, Summons, Complaint, Plaintiffs Interrogatories, Plaintiffs Request for Production, Answer to Complaint, and #2 Civil Cover Sheet.) (jlh)
February 11, 2022 Notice to All Counsel of Record: Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (jlh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Weisner et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dreamieyla Smith
Represented By: Ashleigh Ruth Madison
Represented By: Quentin L. Marlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Weisner
Represented By: C. Shane Keith
Represented By: David H. Wilson
Represented By: William H. Major, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Combined Transport, Inc.
Represented By: C. Shane Keith
Represented By: David H. Wilson
Represented By: William H. Major, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?