Tuten v. Wilcher et al
| Nash N. Tuten |
| Sheriff John Wilcher and Tony Freeseman |
| 4:2022cv00080 |
| April 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. PLRA due by 6/14/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 5/31/2022. (ca)
|
| Filing 9 Service Remark by Nash Tuten. (jrb) |
| Filing 8 Service REMARK by Nash Tuten. (jrb) |
| Filing 7 Letter from Nash N. Tuten. (jlh) |
| Filing 6 Letter from Nash N. Tuten. (jlh) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nash N. Tuten. (ca) |
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray. District Judge R. Stan Baker no longer assigned to the case. (ca) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re Magistrate Assignment as to John Wilcher, Tony Freeseman. Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment Due on 4/19/2022. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 4/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Party's Statement) (ca)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Fee Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Set Deadlines: Compliance due by 4/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP form)(ca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Nash N. Tuten. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
