Cohns v. Wilcher et al
| Gordon D'Andre Cohns |
| John T. Wilcher and Shalena Cook Jones |
| 4:2022cv00100 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that the re #1 Complaint should be dismissed without prejudice for failing to prosecute this case. Objections to R&R due by 6/29/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 6/15/22. (loh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE re #2 Order re Magistrate Assignment. After 14 days a notice of noncompliance will be submitted to a judicial officer for possible sanctions, to include dismissal. Compliance due by 5/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Order and Statement)(slt) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Fee Deficiency re #1 Complaint. (Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 5/9/2022.) (Attachment: #1 IFP Short Form.) (jlh) |
Filing 2
ORDER re Magistrate Assignment. Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment Due on 5/2/2022. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 04/18/2022. (Attachment: #1 Statement re Assignment Form.) (jlh)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants, filed by Gordon D. Cohns. (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
