Salaam v. Wan Hai Lines Ltd et al
| Jafar Salaam |
| Wan Hai Lines Ltd and Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd |
| 4:2022cv00104 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity of citizenship |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Leave of Absence for attorney Patrick Barkley for the dates of Monday, July 11th, 2022 through Wednesday, July 20th, 2022, and Tuesday, December 20th,2022 through Tuesday, January 17th, 2023. (wwp)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #13 MOTION for Leave of Absence as to Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd for dates of : July 11, 2022 - July 20, 2022 and December 20, 2022 through January 17, 2023. (thb) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave of Absence as to Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd for dates of : July 11, 2022 - July 20, 2022 and December 20, 2022 through January 17, 2023 by Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd. Responses due by 6/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order on LOA)(Barkley, Patrick) |
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 7/18/2022. Discovery due by 7/18/2022. Motions due by 12/13/2022. Expert Witness Report (Plaintiff) due by 9/29/2022. Expert Witness Report (defendant) due by 10/14/2022. Status Report due by 11/28/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 5/26/22. (loh)
|
| Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Barkley, Patrick) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (thb) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary R. Sprouse on behalf of Jafar Salaam (Sprouse, Zachary) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Brent Savage, Sr on behalf of Jafar Salaam (Savage, Brent) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Colin A. McRae on behalf of Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd, Wan Hai Lines Ltd (McRae, Colin) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd, Wan Hai Lines Ltd Certification of Notification to State Court Clerk and State Court Judges (Barkley, Patrick) |
| Filing 6 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint of Plaintiff by Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd, Wan Hai Lines Ltd.(Barkley, Patrick) |
|
Filing 5
RULE 26(f)ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 4/19/2022. (gmh)
|
| Filing 4 REMOVAL NOTICE to All Counsel of Record re #1 Notice of Removal. (gmh) |
| Filing 3 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Wan Hai Lines Ltd, Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd. (gmh) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Wan Hai Lines Ltd, Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd. (gmh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd, Wan Hai Lines Ltd from State Court of Chatham County, case number STCV22-0271. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGASDC-3329256.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Jury Verdict Form, #2 Exhibit B - State Ct Summons, Complaint, Discovery & Waiver, #3 Notices of Removal, #4 Statement of State Ct Motions, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(gmh) |
| Notice to All Counsel of Record: Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (gmh) |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: All Defendants: Answer due 4/26/2022. Compliance to #4 due by 4/29/2022. (gmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
