The Ford Field & River Club, Inc. et al v. Schram et al
| The Ford Field & River Club, Inc. and The Ford Field & River Association, Inc. |
| Stephen C. Schram and Schramco, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv00135 |
| May 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| William T Moore |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity of citizenship |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Stephen C. Schram, Schramco, Inc. (slt) |
| Filing 4 Summons Submitted (Bowen, Charles) |
| Filing 3 Summons Submitted (Bowen, Charles) |
Filing 2
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 5/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Litigants' Bill of Rights) (ca)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by The Ford Field & River Club, Inc., The Ford Field & River Association, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ca) |
| Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (ca) |
| Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number AGASDC-3352240. (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
