UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Atlantic Foot and Ankle Specialists, P.C.
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Todd Newsom |
| Atlantic Foot and Ankle Specialists, P.C. |
| 4:2022cv00136 |
| May 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Stay. All deadlines are stayed in this case until the entry of appearance of counsel for Atlantic Foot and Ankle Specialist, PC. The United States is directed to file either a status report or a motion to lift the stay within 60 days of the date of this Order if counsel does not appear. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 07/05/2022. (jlh)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Status Report or motion to lift the stay re #13 due by 9/3/2022. (JH) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #10 MOTION to Stay Proceedings and Deadlines Pending Defendant's Compliance with Court Order and Rule 11(a). (thb) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Permanent Injunction, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Atlantic Foot and Ankle Specialists, P.C.. Responses due by 7/8/2022. (jrb) |
| Filing 11 OBJECTION as to #5 MOTION for Summary Judgment, by Atlantic Foot and Ankle Specialists, P.C. (loh) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Stay Proceedings and Deadlines Pending Defendant's Compliance with Court Order and Rule 11(a) by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Responses due by 7/8/2022. (Porter, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Directing Atlantic Foot and Ankle Specialist PC to retain counsel, who must enter his or her appearance within 30 days from the date of this Order, or Show Cause why it has not yet complied within the same time frame. (Compliance due by 7/24/2022, Show Cause Response due by 7/24/2022.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 6/24/2022. (ca)
|
| Filing 8 (nunc pro tunc 6/10/22) ANSWER to Complaint, CROSSCLAIM against Todd Newsom, COUNTERCLAIM against Todd Newsom by Atlantic Foot and Ankle Specialists, P.C..(ca) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/27/2022: #1 Identical pleading filed on 6/24/22) (jrb). |
| Filing 7 (nunc pro tunc 6/10/22) RESPONSE/Objection to #5 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Atlantic Foot and Ankle Specialists, P.C.. (ca) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE issued re: #5 MOTION for Summary Judgment by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Responses due by 6/21/2022. (thb) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Responses due by 6/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Stmt of Material Fact, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of Margrita Brady)(Porter, Jonathan) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Atlantic Foot and Ankle Specialists, P.C. served on 5/26/2022, answer due 6/16/2022. (Porter, Jonathan) |
| Filing 3 Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (gmh) |
|
Filing 2
RULE 26 INSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 5/24/2022. (gmh)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Atlantic Foot and Ankle Specialists, P.C., filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Settlement Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Letter to AFAS, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (gmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
