Holloman v. Kijakazi
Daniel Holloman |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
Social Security Administration |
4:2022cv00149 |
June 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Savannah Office |
R Stan Baker |
Christopher L Ray |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray. District Judge R. Stan Baker no longer assigned to the case. (thb) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Otto Woelke Leithart on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Leithart, Otto) |
Filing 5 Summonses Issued as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Attorney General Summons) (gmh) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi. (gmh) |
Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER for Social Security Appeals. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 6/17/2022. (gmh) |
Filing 2 ORDER re Magistrate Assignment as to Kilolo Kijakazi. Plaintiff's Statement Re Assignment Due on 7/1/2022. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 6/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Statement Regarding Assignment of Case to a U.S. Magistrate Judge) (gmh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Daniel Holloman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (gmh) |
Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number AGASDC-3369043. (gmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.