Brown v. Lee
Melvin T. Brown, Jr. |
Jared Lee |
4:2022cv00221 |
September 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
William T Moore |
Christopher L Ray |
Prisoner - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Letter from Melvin Brown. (jrb) |
Filing 9 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to Jared Lee on 11/14/2022. (jlh) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Jared Lee answer due 12/5/2022. (jlh) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiff's request that the Court intervene in a child-custody proceeding be dismissed; ORDER directing USMS service of #1 Complaint filed by Melvin T. Brown, Jr. and this Order; Order directing that Plaintiff's initial partial filing fee of $38.26 is due and that Plaintiff's custodian set aside 20 percent of all future deposits to Plaintiff's account and forward those funds to the Clerk each time the set aside amount reaches $10.00, until the balance of the Court's $350.00 filing fee has been paid in full. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order and Report and Recommendation upon Plaintiff. (Objections to R&R due by 11/21/2022, Responses due by 11/21/2022.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 11/7/2022. (gmh) |
Filing 7 CONSENT by Prisoner Melvin T. Brown, Jr to collection of fees. (ca) |
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Melvin T. Brown, Jr. (ca) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 and #4 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall have fourteen days from the service of this Order to fill out and return the Consent to Collection of Fees and Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. PLRA due by 10/26/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 10/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 PLRA Forms.) (jlh) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Melvin T. Brown, Jr. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (pts) |
Filing 3 ORDER re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to supplement his IFP request within 14 days from the date of entry of this Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve with this Order a blank IFP form for Plaintiffs convenience. Failure to comply with this directive will result in a recommendation of dismissal on IFP-deficiency grounds alone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 9/27/22. (loh) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Supplemental IFP due by 10/11/2022. (loh) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Melvin T. Brown, Jr. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(wwp) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jared Lee, filed by Melvin T. Brown, Jr.(wwp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brown v. Lee | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Melvin T. Brown, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jared Lee | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.