Brown v. Express Professional Staffing et al
Plaintiff: Rosalind Brown
Defendant: Express Professional Staffing and Eva Bumpers
Case Number: 4:2022cv00259
Filed: October 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: William T Moore
Referring Judge: Christopher L Ray
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge as the Court's opinion in this case. Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is directed to remit the $402 filing fee in four monthly installments, three $100 payments and a final payment of $102 payment. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 12/20/2022. (ca)
December 20, 2022 Set Deadline: Compliance re #6 Order due by 1/19/2023. (ca)
November 1, 2022 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the U.S. Magistrate Judge that re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis should be granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff should be DIRECTED to remit the $402 filing fee in four monthly installments, three $100 payments and a final $102 payment. Plaintiff should be DIRECTED to remit the first $100 installment within 30 days of the District Judges disposition of this Report and Recommendation, and to remit the full $402 fee within 120 days of that disposition. The Clerk is DIRECTED to record Plaintiff's payments on the docket. Objections to R&R due by 11/15/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 11/1/22. (loh)
October 28, 2022 Filing 4 Notice to All Counsel of Record: Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (jlh)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 10/28/2022. (jlh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/28/2022: #1 Litigants' Bill of Rights) (jlh).
October 28, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Rosalind Brown. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (jlh)
October 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants, filed by Rosalind Brown. (jlh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Express Professional Staffing et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosalind Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Express Professional Staffing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eva Bumpers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?