One Hundred Miles v. The United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
| One Hundred Miles |
| The United States Army Corps of Engineers and Col. Joseph Geary |
| 4:2022cv00297 |
| December 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Joseph Geary answer due 2/20/2023; The United States Army Corps of Engineers answer due 2/20/2023. (thb) |
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Rule 26(f) Order, Disclosure Statement served on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Col. Joseph Geary, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney's Office on 12/22/2022 and 12/23/2022, filed by One Hundred Miles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Proof of Service - USACE, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Proof of Service - Col. Joseph Geary, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Proof of Service - USAG, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Proof of Service - USAO)(Huynh, Megan) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for attorney Brittany Shaar. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 1/5/23. (wwp)
|
|
Filing 11
TEXT ONLY ORDER dismissing as a duplicate #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. #10 Amended Motion was filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 1/5/2023. (MD)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by One Hundred Miles re #8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number AGASDC-3498004, Fee Amount $200, Amended Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order of Admission)(Huynh, Megan) Modified on 1/5/2023 (thb). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. After 14 days a notice of noncompliance will be submitted to a judicial officer for possible sanctions, to include dismissal. Compliance due by 1/19/2023. (thb) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number AGASDC-3498004, Fee Amount $200, by One Hundred Miles. Responses due by 1/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order of Admission)(Huynh, Megan) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #10 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Receipt Number AGASDC-3498004, Fee Amount $200. (thb) |
| Filing 7 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by One Hundred Miles. (Huynh, Megan) |
| Filing 6 Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (ca) |
|
Filing 5
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 12/15/2022. (ca)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Joseph Geary. (ca) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The United States Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ca) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by One Hundred Miles. (ca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by One Hundred Miles. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Fee paid: Receipt # AGASDC-3487559) (ca) Modified on 12/16/2022 (ca). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
