Donnell v. Jordan et al
Michael Lee Donnell |
Mrs. Jordan and GA Diagnostic and Classification Prison |
4:2023cv00002 |
January 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
William T Moore |
Christopher L Ray |
Prisoner - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER Transferring case to the Middle District of Georgia for all further proceedings. The prior Order granting Donnell leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is VACATED. Doc. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to reactivate the IFP motion for disposition in the transferee District. Doc. 2. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 1/6/2023. (pts) |
Case transferred to Middle District of Georgia. File Transferred Electronically. (pts) |
Filing 3 ***VACATED PER ORDER OF 1/6/2023*** ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, subject to the conditions within this Order. PLRA due by 1/19/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 01/05/2023. (Attachments: #1 PLRA Forms.) (jlh) Modified on 1/6/2023 (pts). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Lee Donnell. Responses due by 1/17/2023. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(pts) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Michael Lee Donnell.(pts) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.