Boyd v. State of Georgia et al
| Davious M. Boyd |
| State of Georgia, Kendrick Clayton, Crystal Steele, Kora Baker, Morris Marcus, Guy Young and Kimberly Summers |
| 4:2023cv00150 |
| June 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER transferring case to the Waycross Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 6/12/2023. (gmh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER re Magistrate Assignment as to State of Georgia, Kendrick Clayton, Crystal Steele, Kora Baker, Morris Marcus, Guy Young, Kimberly Summers. Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment Due on 6/22/23. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 6/8/23. (Attachments: #1 Statement) (loh)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Fee Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Plaintiff must either pay the filing fee or submit a properly completed Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 21 days from the date of this notice. Failure to comply with this notice may result in dismissal by the Court. (loh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Davious M. Boyd.(loh) |
| Set/Reset Deadline: Filing Fee/IFP due by 6/29/2023. (loh) |
| Set/Reset Deadline: Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment due by 6/22/2023. (loh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
