Freeman v. Freeman
| Jacqueline Freeman |
| Kirk Douglas Freeman |
| 4:2023cv00173 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| William T Moore |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity of citizenship |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered pursuant to #12 Order. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 7/20/2023. (ca) |
Filing 12
ORDER ADOPTING #10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff's claims asserted in this case are clearly meritless, and this case is dismissed. However, the Court will permit further proceedings on Plaintiff's newly asserted breach-of-contract claims in case CV423-193, to continue and will evaluate those claims in the ordinary course of business. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 7/20/2023. (ca)
|
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kirk Douglas Freeman, filed by Jacqueline Freeman.(jlh) |
| Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiff's #1 Complaint and #7 Amended Complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Objections to R&R due by 7/11/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 6/27/2023. (ca) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 6/27/2023. (ca)
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Jacqueline Freeman. (gmh) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kirk Douglas Freeman, filed by Jacqueline Freeman. (Attachments: #1 Subpoenas, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (gmh) |
| Filing 6 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Jacqueline Freeman. (loh) |
| Filing 5 Summons Submitted. (loh) |
| Filing 4 Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (ca) |
|
Filing 3
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 6/23/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Litigants' of Rights) (ca)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jacqueline Freeman. Responses due by 7/10/2023. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(ca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT/Petition for Federal Criminal Prosecution of Non-Support against Kirk Douglas Freeman, filed by Jacqueline Freeman.(ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Freeman v. Freeman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jacqueline Freeman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Kirk Douglas Freeman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
