Buck Island, LLC et al v. Hill
| Buck Island, LLC and BEP Land Investors, LLC |
| John Hill |
| 4:2023cv00179 |
| June 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Roberts, James) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (csr) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Buck Island, LLC, BEP Land Investors, LLC. John Hill waiver sent on 7/6/2023, answer due 9/5/2023. (Roberts, James) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to John Hill. (csr) |
| Filing 4 Summons Submitted (Roberts, James) |
| Filing 3 Notice to All Counsel of Record: Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (jlh) |
Filing 2
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 06/30/2023. (jlh)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Hill, filed by Buck Island, LLC and BEP Land Investors, LLC. (Fee paid: Receipt # AGASDC-3613904, $402.00.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Contract, #2 Exhibit B - Collective, #3 Verification, #4 Verification, #5 Civil Cover Sheet.) (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
