Nesbitt v. Mims
Petitioner: Derrick Nesbitt
Respondent: Charles Mims
Not Classified By Court: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Case Number: 4:2023cv00181
Filed: July 3, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: William T Moore
Referring Judge: Christopher L Ray
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2023 Filing 10 Appeal Remark re #8 Notice of Appeal: Request for COA Received from Circuit. COA denied per #6 Order. (ca) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/29/2023: #1 Main Document (Correct PDF)) (thb).
August 25, 2023 Filing 9 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #6 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations, #7 Clerk's Judgment, and #8 Notice of Appeal. Other Appeals: No; Judge Appealed: Judge William T. Moore, Jr.; Court Reporter: N/;A Fee Paid: No; and Pending COA/IFP: No. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet and Record on Appeal.) (jlh)
August 25, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and #7 Clerk's Judgment, by Derrick Nesbitt. (jlh)
August 7, 2023 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered pursuant to #6 Order. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/7/2023. (ca)
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge as the Court's opinion. Petitioner's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is dismissed. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 8/7/2023. (ca)
July 27, 2023 Filing 5 OBJECTION as to #4 Report and Recommendation, by Derrick Nesbitt. (loh)
July 11, 2023 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the U.S. Magistrate Judge that re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis should be denied and the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 7/25/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 7/11/23. (loh)
July 3, 2023 Filing 3 Inmate Account Statement by Derrick Nesbitt. (ca) Modified on 7/6/2023 (cmr).
July 3, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Derrick Nesbitt. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(wwp)
July 3, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Derrick Nesbitt.(wwp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nesbitt v. Mims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derrick Nesbitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Charles Mims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?